Hi Honors Students,
Tuesday, April 13th is the first day of Presidential March Madness. I would like you to sign on to my blog and lead a class discussion on how you feel it went.
October 8, 2007
WINSLOW — District Attorney Evert N. Fowle said in his 22
years in the legal profession, he had never heard of a school
employee strip-searching a student -- until last month.
Fowle said the strip-search of a Winslow High School girl,
revealed by the Maine Civil Liberties Union on Sept. 27, never
came across his desk. Sally Sutton, executive director of the
Maine Civil Liberties Union from 1984 to 2001, said she never
dealt with such a case during her tenure.
A school official strip-searching a student is an act that deals
with fundamental rights -- specifically, the Fourth Amendment,
aimed at protecting citizens from unreasonable search and
seizure.
Did Winslow High School officials violate the rights of the then
16-year-old girl they strip-searched from the waist up? The
settlement reached between the Maine Civil Liberties Union and
Winslow High does not answer the question. Nowhere in the
agreement does the high school admit to violating the civil
rights of the student.
The fact that the school paid a settlement of $15,000 -- $6,500
in attorney fees, $8,500 in damages to the girl -- and agreed to
apologize for the incident in writing are proof of regret, but not
an admittance of guilt.
Winslow High School Vice Principal Terry Atwood said in court
filings that the search was reasonable under the circumstances
and, thus, constitutionally valid.
At the same time, the school system has agreed to alter its
policies to prohibit strip-searches of students by school
employees.
All of which points to the murky nature of the Fourth
Amendment, particularly as it applies to the relationship
between school officials and children in a school building.
"Every case as far as its legality would have to be determined on
a case-by-case basis," Fowle said. "There is not a cookie-cutter
way that it can be judged."
CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution offers protection
against a government that threatens rights of privacy through
search or seizure.
A public school employee is considered a government official,
according to Cabanne Howard, a professor at the University of
Maine School of Law. "Schools are clearly the government," he
said. "There is no issue about that at all."
That means a public school official can be held accountable for
violating the rights of a student by strip-searching that student.
A private school, in contrast, would be exempt from the law. "If
parents don't like it," Cabanne said, "they can take their child out
of the school."
That said, a strip-search of a student is a highly invasive action
regardless of the constitutional implications and could bring
legal action on other grounds, said Michael J. Steinberg, legal
director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan.
Michael Kaplan, a lawyer with the Portland law firm of Preti,
Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, put it in more blunt terms: "Strip-
searches are particularly intrusive. And regardless of what one
case or another says, you better damn well have good
justification for it."
PROBABLE CAUSE
That gets to the issue of probable cause versus reasonable
suspicion. In the legal world, there is great distinction between
the two.
"Suffice it to say," the ACLU's Steinberg said, "that (probable
cause) is a higher standard than reasonable suspicion."
Police are obligated to have probable cause, he said, before they
consider strip-searching a suspect. And before they do so, they
must go to court to obtain a search warrant.
Public school officials, Steinberg said, do not need a search
warrant, and they do not need the same level of evidence.
Fowle said the first concern of school officials is the health and
safety of all students and faculty in the school, a charge that,
given certain circumstances, can override the civil rights of an
individual.
The rub is the nature of those circumstances, Steinberg said.
The reasonable suspicion must first not be of a general nature,
he said. For example, school officials cannot act simply on a
rumor that somebody in the school is in illegal possession of
prescription drugs.
The magnitude of the possible violation also must be
considered. To strip-search a student for stealing money, he
said, would not be appropriate because the offense would not
threaten the safety of other students.
If the concern is a weapon, however, such an intrusive measure
might be justified, he said.
CASES BECOMING MORE COMMON
Given the subjective nature of reasonable suspicion, as well as
the intrusiveness of a strip search, Fowle argues that school
officials should be extremely wary of taking such measures.
"Police are probably better equipped and better trained to
conduct the investigation than school officials are," he said. "I
think it is probably wise for the school and local police agency to
work in concert. The most important thing is to ensure the
safety of everybody in the school."
The ACLU's Steinberg, though, said that across the country the
number of strip-searches by school officials is increasing.
"I think it is more common," he said, "and it is part of a
disturbing trend around the country of school officials turning
schoolhouses into jailhouses. It is just one of many policies or
practices of that nature that are becoming more common."
"Strip-searches," he said, "just should not be conducted by
school officials."
Copyright © 2007 Blethen Maine Newspapers